Internal Quality Assurance Cell

*Anti-Ragging Cell Control Rooms / Helplines: 91(44) 22759200 Ext 212 & 91(44) 22759200 Ext 198 / 131 / 133 *Internal Complaints Committee to Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal of Sexual Harassment of Women Employees and students at Workplace (Helpline: 91-044-22759200 Extn:343) *Caste discrimination Cell Control Rooms / Helplines: 91(44) 22759200 Ext 212 & 91(44) 22759200 Ext 198 / 131 / 133 *Students having any grievance on academic matters may contact [email protected]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Part – A
Data of the InstitutionPart – A
Extended ProfileCriterion 1Criterion 2Criterion 3Criterion 4Criterion 5Criterion 6Criterion 7

Annual Qaulity Assurance Report (AQAR) for AY 2021-22

The Annual Quality Assurance Report (AQAR) of the IQAC

(For Universities)

Institutions Accredited by NAAC need to submit an Annual self-reviewed progress report i.e. Annual Quality Assurance Report (AQAR) to NAAC, through its IQAC. The report is to detail the tangible results achieved in key areas, specifically identified by the IQAC at the beginning of the Academic year. The AQAR period would be the Academic Year. (For example, June 1, 2017 to May 31, 2018)
Criterion II – Teaching-Learning and Evaluation
Key Indicator – 2.1 Student Enrolments and Profile
Metric No.
2.1.1
QnM		 Demand Ratio
2.1.1.1:Number of seats available during the year

Year
Number
2.1.2
QnM		 Total number of seats filled against reserved categories (SC, ST, OBC, Divyangjan, etc.) as per applicable reservation policy during the year (Excluding Supernumerary Seats)
2.1.2.1:Number of actual students admitted from the reserved categories during the year

Year
Number
Key Indicator – 2.2 Catering to Student Diversity
Metric No.
2.2.1
QlM		 The institution assesses the learning levels of the students and organises special Programmes for advanced learners and slow learners

2.2.2
QnM 		Student – Full time teacher ratio during the year

Year
Number of Students
Number of teachers
Key Indicator – 2.3 Teaching – Learning Process
Metric No.
2.3.1
QlM		 Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem-solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences
2.3.2
QlM		 Teachers use ICT enabled tools including online resources for effective teaching and learning processes during the year
2.3.3
QnM 		Ratio ofstudents to mentor for academic and other related issues during the year
2.3.3.1:Number of mentors: Number of students assigned to each mentor:

Year
Number of mentors
Key Indicator – 2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality
Metric No.
2.4.1
QnM 		Total Number of full time teachers against sanctioned posts during the year

Year
Number
2.4.2
QnM		 Total Number of full time teachers with Ph.D./D.M/M.Ch./D.N.B Superspeciality/D.Sc./D’Lit. during the year

Year
Number
2.4.3
QnM 		Total teaching experience of full time teachers in the same institution during the year
2.4.3.1:Total experience of full-time teachers Data Requirements: (As per Data Template)
2.4.4
QnM 		Total number of full time teachers who received awards, recognition, fellowships at State, National, International level from Government/Govt. recognised bodies during the year

Year
Number
Key Indicator – 2.5 Evaluation Process and Reforms
Metric No.
2.5.1
QnM 		Number of days from the date of last semester-end/ year- end examination till the declaration of results during the year
2.5.1.1 Number of days from the date of last semester-end/ year- end examination till the declaration of results year wise during the year:

Year
Number
2.5.2
QnM 		Total number of student complaints/grievances about evaluation against total number appeared in the examinations during the year

Year
Number
Data Requirement:
  • Number of complaints/grievances about evaluation
  • Total number of students appeared in the examinations
  • Upload the data template
  • Upload relevant supporting document

(Data template is not applicable to this metric)
2.5.3
QlM 		IT integrationand reforms in the examination procedures and processes (continuous internal assessment and end-semester assessment) have brought in considerable improvement in examination management system of the institution
2.5.4
QnM		 Status of automation of Examination division along with approved Examination Manual
Key Indicator – 2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcomes
Metric No.
2.6.1
QlM  		 The institution has stated learning outcomes (generic and programme specific)/graduate attributes which are integrated into the assessment process and widely publicized through the website and other documents
2.6.2
QlM		 Attainment of Programme outcomes, Programme specific outcomes and course outcomes are evaluated by the institution during the year
2.6.3
QnM		 Number of students passed during the year  
2.6.3.1: Total number of final year students who passed the university examination
2.6.3.2: Total number of final year students who appeared for the examination
Key Indicator- 2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey
Metric No.
2.7.1
QnM		 Student Satisfaction Survey (SSS) on overall institutional performance (Institution may design its own questionnaire) (results and details need to be provided as a web link)